Sunday, 29 January 2012

Child Poverty - have they forgotten their pledge?

How realistic is the government's pledge to end child poverty by 2020? The strategy is hugely ambitious and progress has stalled.
JRF suggests the following  
This note  draws on the findings of seven reports about how to take forward different aspects of a child poverty strategy; examines the impact of current policy; and suggests what is needed to ensure the target is met.
The seven related reports are:
 Key Points
  • Over the last few years a significant reduction in child poverty has been achieved, backed by significant resources. However, further progress depends on a big shift that raises the level of resources invested and widens the scope of anti-poverty measures.
  • The strategy requires over two million more children to be taken out of poverty, four times the progress since 1997. No single policy can achieve this. Only if worklessness is reduced and benefits raised and working parents' earnings improved does the strategy stand a chance of success.
  • Improvement of in-work incomes is particularly needed – there has been little progress on reducing in-work poverty and existing policy tools seem inadequate.
  • The child poverty strategy will need to help parents into jobs but also consider factors affecting their earnings opportunities, including:
    • the adequacy of childcare
    • job flexibility for parents
    • the level of parental skills; and
    • how these are used by employers to create quality employment.
  • Ending child poverty will depend not just on provision but on the behaviour of individuals, employers and public bodies, including:
    • decisions taken by families about working patterns, including whether both members of a couple work, as well as the number of working hours;
    • whether employers offer parents good quality jobs, with hours that meet their wants and constraints; and
    • whether government agencies provide support that genuinely responds to individuals' needs.
  • Families, employers and government need to work together to combat child poverty:
    • This partnership needs to deliver improved routes into work, so that parents can work in a way that complements their family lives.
    • It needs to repair the damaging mistrust between families and the state, and create a benefits and tax credits system that reliably helps families to escape poverty.
    • Finally, basic benefits need to provide an adequate foundation for improvement in families' lives, enabling them to avoid hardship and debt.

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Key Points:

Sounds great; would work too if we lived in cloud-cuckoo-land.

For example, as reported in the London Evening Standard (2 Feb 2012): "AstraZeneca today set out plans to fire another 7350 staff, after admitting revenues would fall this year because of the expiry of patents on key drugs and governments demanding discounts."

High taxes, high regulations, high benefit culture, we end up with an economy that is not generating well paid jobs for Brits.

Just the other day I read a post from a lecturer at Newport University arguing against companies that make huge amounts of money. OK, so let’s tax them to death and watch out for follow on massive job cuts.

Many hate "the drug companies" - they make disgusting profits. Let’s make life hard for them. Forgetting that the biggest beneficiary of their success is the Inland Revenue which is the source of funding for our benefits system.

With the massive job losses at AstraZeneca maybe it will finally dawn on people that the UK needs very successful businesses.